Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:But that's exactly the point I'm making. At least at LF, because the polls can be about anything, even if they're in an "episode thread", and because they can have "sub-selections" attached to each number (ie. "William Returns" 10 = Yay! XANA got William! or the like ), they're not very reliable polls to begin with, so the whole arguement about voting honestly falls apart if the poll doesn't say anything really important about the episode in the first place.
Hmm just looked at the Teddygodzilla one and I see what you mean there. Still, I don't see why people shouldn't vote honestly for a fun poll. Otherwise they're just not playing properly. And what's fun about that?
*sweatdrops* But the original debate wasn't about the fun polls. It's about the polls where a person is voting a "10" of "Wow 'dis episode was teh best eva!!1!" without thinking about it first, and how that reflects on the episode as a whole and how much that's going to help a person decide whether it's a worthwhile episode or not (and in a grander scale, give MoonScoop useable feedback). In this respect, the fun polls do little to none of this since a poll about whether or not the "underwear sequences" were awesome (for dubious reasons), is not going to help anyone understand how good the episode was as a poll.
Therefore, the fun polls are not the issue here, and I'd have to say that it would be even more impossible to encourage people to take the fun polls seriously, when they're not serious polls in of themselves. That's like walking up to a bunch of people playing their own variation of Frisbee and telling them, "No no no, that's not how it's done. You have to play it this way.".
At any rate, the fun polls weren't the original issue. It's the polls dictating the rating of the episode as a whole, and how well they help someone determine the overall quality of an episode...and honestly there aren't a lot of them that seriously give a wide array of options that would make for an honest poll like that.
Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:That's why I don't see why there's any point in making a big deal out of someone voting a 10 or not an episode, unless you're talking about season 4 and beyond. Most of the polls made previous to this whole debate were not made with the intention that the votes be taken seriously. Teddygozilla is not the only one...a quick scan of several of the polls will show you that.
Well, given Rodri brought this up after William Returns aired, Season 4 and beyond are probably relevant, yeah. So the rest of the polls over season 4 are going to be serious ones?
Because basically you're using polls which aren't about how good the episode is to counter an argument that people aren't voting honestly in polls about how good the episode is.
That depends upon whoever makes the episode thread and the poll options, which at the moment, I think only the Admins can. Now we can make a 10 option poll with scores 1 through 10 and leave it at that, and hope people vote the number they think the episode actually deserves but that's about it. We can't really "encourage" people to vote "seriously", since they can easily say, "Yes, I thought it deserved a 10." And that's that. It's on their own conscience.
If you want all the polls on Episode Discussion to be like that, with no fun polls or silly "comment options" added in, and be completely serious about giving a critical review of the episode in the poll, we can do that from now on if that's what everyone (or at least a majority) agrees to.
Sounds rather dull to me, since I like the silly options that get tagged onto the ratings and seeing people come up with creative options for each episode (ie. William Returns: 1 = "Grab your torch and pitchforks." and the like) But if a serious poll is what the majority wants...then, alright. ^^
Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:As for TV.com, their poll system is a 1-10 system (with all of the numbers counted and no addition "sub-comments" attached) that takes an average of all the scores given. Meaning that, while a 10 can boost an episode's score, it will likely only do so by a .01 or .1 percentage, in which case, it's minimal and the 10 really becomes obsolete in the grand scheme of things.
Now, that's just ignoring the wood because of the pretty trees. A poll result is the sum of it's votes. And those 10's can add up pretty fast.
Kudos on the metaphor. ^^
However, the polls here don't have the "averaging" feature though, just a number of how many people voted for what rating.
People have eyes though. If one category has 30 votes, another has 26 and the rest have 4, people can figure it out for themselves from there.
As you said earlier though, this is the Internet. There's no room for underestimating or overestimating the populace. ^^;
Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:And yes, while those 10s could add up pretty fast, I'm willing to bet that the sheer mass of people that frequent TV.com would make it so that any amount of 10s given would have to be a large one, in order to make a clearly significant difference. What's more, I'd imagine the random CL haters that frequently haunt that site and that poll a 0 or 1 would cancel out the random thoughtless 10s. And a member can only vote 1 time, so there's no double submissions of votes (unless of course the person creates a second account or something, which in any case could happen anywhere).
While it's true Blind 10's and and Blind 1's can cancel each other to an extent, they still exist. And as you said, we don't have the averaging feature, so five votes are still five votes. And I'm guessing we're a smaller auidence than TV.com, so any votes stand out that little bit more
True, and a valid point, but the original post I made was in response to a comment Rodri made about me bringing up TV.com (XD ...if that made any sense ^^; ).
The original point was that, while I loathe to admit, TV.com's episode and show polls are more better designed to give an honest reflection of an episode or show's quality, than LF's since we don't have the averaging feature and we're a smaller audience so that "extreme" votes stand out more. That's why, in my very first post, I said that, if I were someone looking for a serious, and less biased poll review of an episode, I'd go to TV.com (or IMDB), because of the wider selection, the averaging feature, and the grander ratings scale (1-10) as opposed to a devoted fan forum where the selection is smaller, and polls would either have a smaller ratings scale, or have nothing to do with the episode to begin with.
Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:And still, like I said, what everyone is forgetting is that, unless we're going to try and be "honest" for season 4, which is again going to be an impossible feat in itself, there's no point in trying to require people to vote "honestly" on the polls we have now. A lot of them weren't made for that purpose, so there's no point in requiring someone to vote seriously, if the poll was made for laughs to begin with.
Again, you're using non-serious polls to argue a point about serious polls. And again, if people aren't voting honestly in a fun poll, what's the point?
^^; See first quote response for that point.
Cassius335 wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:On top of that, there is no way that we could "require" someone to vote in what we would feel an "honest" way, because it's impossible.
First off, only the Admins and Mods would have to have the authority to do it, because otherwise it'd cause too many fights. Second off, I really doubt that any of the Admins and Mods would enjoy trying to figure out who voted a 10 so that they can ask them if they "really honestly believe" it deserved that mark. Third, we can't force someone to vote "honestly" either, because honesty and perfection are completely up to perspective. And fourth...the comments will still be a much better way of judging an episode than the polls.
Ok, we can't force anyone into anything. Not important; the basic points still the same: a Well-thought out vote from someone who can actually be bothered to leave comments is going to be worth more than a 10 vote with no comments left (without which, your fourth point becomes rather moot)
Fair enough, however the problem is still getting people to do that without either harassing them and/or second guessing every single vote that looks "extreme". And the problem still remains that it's on their conscience to vote "honestly", because they can always turn around and say, "Yes, it deserves a 10 and that's how I feel."
Cassius335 wrote:Even if the poll is "Doesn't he look daft in that hat" or somesuch, then we should still vote honestly because that's what a poll is for: collating peoples honest opinions.
Like I said before, it's on their conscience.
And what's more, the fun polls aren't going to help a person decide whether an episode is of high quality or not, particularly when they're tagged onto an episode in episode discussion (which was the original focus of this thread), so whether or not they're voted on seriously, is not going to help someone decide how good an episode (or the show as a whole) is.
That's what my original point was trying to say: That's there's no point in trying to get people to vote "seriously" on the present episode threads because half of them don't give any room for honest review anyway. That's what I found most ironic about this whole issue...at the moment, there's no way a person can give a real serious review of an episode or the show other than through comments because the polls don't allow much room for it.
And again, like I said before, we can make all the episode thread polls "serious polls" from now on (for the duration of season 4, and whatever missing season 1 episodes we have), if everyone wants to hop onto this "episode review" idea.
Or we could do away with polls entirely (or just make them all nonsense polls); That's the other extreme. It's up to all of you, really (and I do mean a fair majority, not just one or two people ^^; ). We can even take a vote on it, if it comes to that.
Cassius335 wrote:We can't force anyone else to vote honestly, but we can vote honestly ourselves and hoopefully encourage others to do the same.
And there's the rub. How are we going to straddle that fine line between "encouraging" and "harassing" a person about voting honestly, without making ourselves nervous stressed-out wrecks, or making this forum less fun to visit. It's impossible...or improbable...take your pick. ^^;
It's up to the individual, and that's it. It's on their own conscience to decide whether they want to vote honestly, or not. And there's no way to prove a person didn't vote "honestly", unless of course they turn around and say, "Yes I voted 10 cuz I am teh hyper lolz"...which...isn't completely unlikely, but probably not going to happen too often. *sweatdrops*
There's nothing else to be done about it really.