Moderators: The Administrators, Moderators
animenologist wrote:Of course Code Lyoko has a main character, it just doesn't have A main character. The entire gang are the main characters, and none of them steals all the focus from the other characters. If you are basing this on the importance of the character in the overall plotline, you're looking at the wrong criteria for a main character. I can think of multiple stories where the removal of an element would lead to a loss of story but that doesn't make them THE main character, and I still stand by the reasoning that focus makes the main character, not importance, of which the entire gang shares equally.
SamBlob wrote:The most important characters are Aelita and XANA, for the reason stated earlier: they are the focal points of the plot of the show.
The main characters are the five members of Team Lyoko.
There is no one leader of Team Lyoko, but decisions and policy generally tend to be made by Jeremy, Aelita or Yumi. Jeremy's decisions are often modified or overruled by Yumi as a voice of reason and/or by Aelita as a voice of conscience.
At least, that's the way I see it. And I thought about this a *lot* at TVTome...
Ransomed_Heart wrote:After reading all three pages of this, I have to say I agree pretty much with animeologist and Mewberries. There is no one "main" character, the show is focused on all of them repectively. That is actually a smart plan for the series creators because it gives their entire audience someone to relate to, rather than just one main character.
I also don't think there is one solid leader. Jeremie, Yumi, and Aelita do tend to take leadership/decision making roles, but Odd and Ulrich step up and do their part too. We have seen them make perfectly valid decisions with both Yumi and Jeremie absent. They are a team, and that dynamic works well for them because there is no one leader, then make decisions based on whose will work best for them at that point in time. Jeremie has the advantage of knowledge and giant supercomputer to help him, which explains why he has taken on a more leadership role.
animenologist wrote:Multiple times, Jeremie has said nobody should go to Lyoko unless he says so. If Aelita and Yumi had the same weight of authority as Jeremie, then in St. Valentines Day, Aelita and Yumi should have been enough to go to Lyoko on their own or just even to tell Jeremie, that they will go to Lyoko. But instead, they asked him, in which Jeremie agreed since all his necessary concerns were taken care of.
animenologist wrote:Jeremie probably was screaming to pull her out forcefully in Deja Vu, Missing Link, and Ultimatum.
Lani wrote:Eh, in the end, people (real or cartoon) are naked and having a good time. What's wrong with that?
animenologist wrote:...Same idea here, Jeremie tells them their mission, priorities, and rallies them for battle, but come the actual fighting, someone closer to the battle chooses how to get the job done according to the goals spelled out by the general.
Doesn't "guy-in-charge" pretty much mean the same thing as leader?TaskForceLyoko wrote:animenologist wrote:...Same idea here, Jeremie tells them their mission, priorities, and rallies them for battle, but come the actual fighting, someone closer to the battle chooses how to get the job done according to the goals spelled out by the general.
Actually, this would make Jeremie the guy-in-charge, not a leader.
Lyoko_Addict wrote:Doesn't "guy-in-charge" pretty much mean the same thing as leader?TaskForceLyoko wrote:animenologist wrote:...Same idea here, Jeremie tells them their mission, priorities, and rallies them for battle, but come the actual fighting, someone closer to the battle chooses how to get the job done according to the goals spelled out by the general.
Actually, this would make Jeremie the guy-in-charge, not a leader.
Lyoko_Addict wrote:Doesn't "guy-in-charge" pretty much mean the same thing as leader?
Mewberries151 wrote:Sort of...I think a better description might have been that Jeremie is a "Tactician".
RoDrInCuBuS wrote:SamBlob wrote:Multiple times, Jeremie has said nobody should go to Lyoko unless he says so. If Aelita and Yumi had the same weight of authority as Jeremie, then in St. Valentines Day, Aelita and Yumi should have been enough to go to Lyoko on their own or just even to tell Jeremie, that they will go to Lyoko. But instead, they asked him, in which Jeremie agreed since all his necessary concerns were taken care of.
As for Aelita asking Jeremie to go to Lyoko on Saint Valentine's Day, it was the posessed Aelita who asked it to Jeremie just to trick him, not human Aelita Hopper. But if XANA posessing humans can program the computer, how can't XANA create a timer device just to make the scanner work and go with Aelita's body to Lyoko? (Sorry for off-topic) Just wanted to say it was the posessed Aelita who asked Jeremie that on said episode.SamBlob wrote:Jeremie probably was screaming to pull her out forcefully in Deja Vu, Missing Link, and Ultimatum.
As for what I've seen of Missing Link, Jeremie had a real good reason to stop Aelita's transfer process of DNA material with Yumi. It would had made the Scyphozoa's job easier, right?
As for how I see the characthers...
Aelita, along with Franz Hopper and the Carthage project started in 1974 are the main reason of this show's existence. Jeremie's the leader among his 3 friends. He can most likely listen to Aelita's ides since she has probably better knowledge about Lyoko itself. Yumi knows a few about computer programming. On Season 2, she has imporved a bit her skills on certain subject.
There should be an episode showing how Odd and Ulrich would handle the situation without Jeremie, Aelita and Yumi on a XANA attack that requieres an RTTP without Aelita inside Lyoko... I can see it as a two-part episode, most liekly to my sight.
TaskForceLyoko wrote:Lyoko_Addict wrote:Doesn't "guy-in-charge" pretty much mean the same thing as leader?
No. While to most it sounds like a matter of semantics, there is a huge difference between the guy-in-charge and a leader. Ever hear the terms "natural leader" or "born leader"? Garbage. I'll wager that 99% of the folks who use those terms have never met a great leader, and wouldn't know a good leader if one walked up and smacked them on the back of their heads.
TaskForceLyoko wrote: Without writing an essay on the esoterics of the matter, I'll just throw out a few points:
The team follows Jeremie's directions and orders because he is their friend.
Jeremie can not make decisions under the hammer.
Neither one of these are traits of a leader. There's more but like I said, no essay.
SamBlob wrote:Whether a born leader, a good leader or a bad leader, the guy calling the shots *is* the leader, right up until the moment he is overthrown or otherwised relieved of his leadership.
And what, exactly, leads you to think that Jeremy cannot make decisions under fire?
SamBlob wrote:Who are you quoting? I did not say any of that...
Lani wrote:Eh, in the end, people (real or cartoon) are naked and having a good time. What's wrong with that?
TaskForceLyoko wrote:SamBlob wrote:Whether a born leader, a good leader or a bad leader, the guy calling the shots *is* the leader, right up until the moment he is overthrown or otherwised relieved of his leadership.
Only to the ignorant. The title "leader" is thrown around too casually these days to give everyone a feel-good attaboy, but the truth is very few are actually leading. Ordering, commanding, calling the shots is not leadership. A position of authority does not make one a leader, only the one-in-charge. Did you even read what I wrote?
TaskForceLyoko wrote:SamBlob wrote:And what, exactly, leads you to think that Jeremy cannot make decisions under fire?
Screaming "Do something!" or similar when they are in a crisis is not what I call decision making. Screaming "Oh No! The Scipizoa!" and doing nothing more is not decision making. Saying "Hurry up!" and nothing more when the team is fighting for their life is not decision making. Need I say more.
SamBlob wrote:I read what you wrote. I simply do not agree with it.
"leader noun 1 a person or thing that leads. 2 one who has the principal part in something; the head of a group etc." - The Oxford Paparback Dictionary - Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press, 1994 ISBN 0-19-208812-4
Saying "There are rocks to your right; lose them in there" (from "Big Bug") is decision making.
Jumping into the sewer to avoid the hornets ("Swarming Attack") is decision making (and the tough kind too, wherein one makes an unpopular but necessary decision).
Sending everyone in to Lyoko in "Routine" was decision making, although that one proved to be near-disastrous.
Going into XANA's alternate reality to rescue the team in "Ghost Channel" is not only decision making but personal bravery.
Probably the biggest single acknowledgement of Jeremy's leadership is in "Zero Gravity Zone" where Ulrich reluctantly leaves the soccer game on Jeremy's request to go to the Science Block and rescue Mrs. Hertz.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests