Moderators: The Administrators, Moderators
Virtualized STI wrote:
Remember, Milly and Tamiya dont think the same way that older kids do. They think that what they are doing is exciting, and not necessarily thinking about the consequences until its too late.
Virtualized STI wrote:honestly...I dont remember the whole plot of fine mess, id have to watch it again unless someone could give a quick recap, then I would be able to answer that question.
Virtualized STI wrote:honestly...I dont remember the whole plot of fine mess, id have to watch it again unless someone could give a quick recap, then I would be able to answer that question.
animenologist wrote:Why exactly would a school paper have a "Gossip Column"? I would think they would stick to academic and school affairs. They really should try to play the part of professional journalists, not the paparazzi. And really, how much would they be able to write on it just based on that picture, other than the very strange outfit Yumi showed up in the next day and everyone involved would not comment except maybe Sissi, and professionally speaking, she would a very biased source.
Mewberries151 wrote:animenologist wrote:Why exactly would a school paper have a "Gossip Column"? I would think they would stick to academic and school affairs. They really should try to play the part of professional journalists, not the paparazzi. And really, how much would they be able to write on it just based on that picture, other than the very strange outfit Yumi showed up in the next day and everyone involved would not comment except maybe Sissi, and professionally speaking, she would a very biased source.Lots of school newspapers today have gossip columns though. Usually however, the gossip columns are all anonymously written (often using initials) so that no one can be directly accused of anything or humiliated, though if one's initials are obvious enough, it doesn't matter.
Take for example a possible gossip column written in that style based on "TeddyGozilla":
Hey there! It's the Snooper. Well there was a huge dance at KA last night. SD was crowned prom queen for the third year running...no surprise there. Lots of well knowns at the dance too! There was a startling round of new couples and dates this year. ODR showed up with YI! What a complete surprise! Even more surprising was that US, in absense of YI, came to the dance with none other than MS!! Talk about "robbing the cradle", no?As usual, JB was nowhere to be seen at this shindig, and JM looked rather tacky in his white suit and headband get up. Sorry JM...it's just not the 70s anymore. ^^ Well, until the next big Scoop, see you around!
-The Snooper
Lots of papers use that kind of formula. It's joking and sarcastic but unless one knows exactly who's being talked about...it's all anonymous, which is usually why schools allow it now.
YDV wrote:Well you see, the amount of time we didn't normally hang around BKO is kind of like potential energy, and then when we all finally came back at the same time it's like letting loose a catapult. 8D
It's all very scientifical. |D
Stonecreek wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:animenologist wrote:Why exactly would a school paper have a "Gossip Column"? I would think they would stick to academic and school affairs. They really should try to play the part of professional journalists, not the paparazzi. And really, how much would they be able to write on it just based on that picture, other than the very strange outfit Yumi showed up in the next day and everyone involved would not comment except maybe Sissi, and professionally speaking, she would a very biased source.Lots of school newspapers today have gossip columns though. Usually however, the gossip columns are all anonymously written (often using initials) so that no one can be directly accused of anything or humiliated, though if one's initials are obvious enough, it doesn't matter.
Take for example a possible gossip column written in that style based on "TeddyGozilla":
Hey there! It's the Snooper. Well there was a huge dance at KA last night. SD was crowned prom queen for the third year running...no surprise there. Lots of well knowns at the dance too! There was a startling round of new couples and dates this year. ODR showed up with YI! What a complete surprise! Even more surprising was that US, in absense of YI, came to the dance with none other than MS!! Talk about "robbing the cradle", no?As usual, JB was nowhere to be seen at this shindig, and JM looked rather tacky in his white suit and headband get up. Sorry JM...it's just not the 70s anymore. ^^ Well, until the next big Scoop, see you around!
-The Snooper
Lots of papers use that kind of formula. It's joking and sarcastic but unless one knows exactly who's being talked about...it's all anonymous, which is usually why schools allow it now.
It's about time I chimed in on this ubject, since I am a reporter IRL. At our paper, all editorail and opinion pieces are either run with an author's namee or not run at all. We could get sued for libel otherwise. And the only place for sarcasm is in the opinion columns, and they are a big draw for the readers. Gossip is popular and entertaining, making it easier to read about than, say, a homicide. The police reports are still the most poular part of the paper, though. But, back to the original point, the gossip is in there to balance the paper out and draw readers in that otherwise wouldn't read the paper.
animenologist wrote:Stonecreek wrote:Mewberries151 wrote:animenologist wrote:Why exactly would a school paper have a "Gossip Column"? I would think they would stick to academic and school affairs. They really should try to play the part of professional journalists, not the paparazzi. And really, how much would they be able to write on it just based on that picture, other than the very strange outfit Yumi showed up in the next day and everyone involved would not comment except maybe Sissi, and professionally speaking, she would a very biased source.Lots of school newspapers today have gossip columns though. Usually however, the gossip columns are all anonymously written (often using initials) so that no one can be directly accused of anything or humiliated, though if one's initials are obvious enough, it doesn't matter.
Take for example a possible gossip column written in that style based on "TeddyGozilla":
Hey there! It's the Snooper. Well there was a huge dance at KA last night. SD was crowned prom queen for the third year running...no surprise there. Lots of well knowns at the dance too! There was a startling round of new couples and dates this year. ODR showed up with YI! What a complete surprise! Even more surprising was that US, in absense of YI, came to the dance with none other than MS!! Talk about "robbing the cradle", no?As usual, JB was nowhere to be seen at this shindig, and JM looked rather tacky in his white suit and headband get up. Sorry JM...it's just not the 70s anymore. ^^ Well, until the next big Scoop, see you around!
-The Snooper
Lots of papers use that kind of formula. It's joking and sarcastic but unless one knows exactly who's being talked about...it's all anonymous, which is usually why schools allow it now.
It's about time I chimed in on this ubject, since I am a reporter IRL. At our paper, all editorail and opinion pieces are either run with an author's namee or not run at all. We could get sued for libel otherwise. And the only place for sarcasm is in the opinion columns, and they are a big draw for the readers. Gossip is popular and entertaining, making it easier to read about than, say, a homicide. The police reports are still the most poular part of the paper, though. But, back to the original point, the gossip is in there to balance the paper out and draw readers in that otherwise wouldn't read the paper.
Now are you a reporter for a school paper or an actual paper? I would think that a school paper would have some stricter content control and I believe have been shown the exercise that right a few times. Can't remember when but there was a case where the school paper placed an article of questionable content into their paper, but before it could get to the students was taken out by the school administration. The students sued stating that their free speech rights had been violated, but favor was toward the administration since they funded the paper and thus has control of what articles go in and out.
Entertainment, opinion, sports, and police reports are one thing. Posting excerpts from a student's stolen diary and their name is an entirely different for a school paper. An anonymous gossip may be slightly below the line, but their gossip column included a 2 page large blow up of Ulrich and Yumi in an interesting position. I don't remember my high school or college paper doing something like that or printing stories like "Special exclusive, guess what the principal's daughter is seen doing behind the shed". At the very least, I would expect the principal to take it off if it concerned a student's private matters. But maybe my ideas are a bit weird.
YDV wrote:Well you see, the amount of time we didn't normally hang around BKO is kind of like potential energy, and then when we all finally came back at the same time it's like letting loose a catapult. 8D
It's all very scientifical. |D
Stonecreek wrote:I have worked for a real paper, and currently work for a college paper. They have far less restrictions than high school newspapers do, whcih is why I never did newspaper in high school. They DO exercise control far too often at that level, but at college, we're on our own with our paper. We print some scandalous stuff. One of our fraternities got suspended nationally recently for thrwoing a racially insensitive party, and we covered that - an investigative article and a two-page spread on campus reaction. Newspapers have a tendency to sensationalize, I'll admit, but it's not all that. This week, for instance, my story is on the Scholar's Symposium we're hosting. Kinda hard to sensationalize that...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests