
Moderators: The Administrators, Moderators
Zaruko-chan wrote:My gosh why aren't anyone reading what other's type! They don't care but you should care about other lives it goes against the Core Democratic Value Life!! You should care about other people's lives. You are giving me a headach because you don't understand how bad abortion is! Why can't anyone understand? Is the world filled with imbeciles?!? Why don't you people listen! ?! Darn it! If I'm not making any sense just tell me, but I'm pretty sure that I'm making perfect sense so just listen ABORTION IS HORRIBLE!! Just listen to me! You don't understand how bad it is. OK, ok. Let me explain the Pursuit of Happiness; it means that you can do anything you please but it can't harm others. Which abortion isn't being Purisuit of Happiness so you shouldn't have abortion. There are other options, like setting up adoption which is humane. Just abortion is the worst thing possible for someone to think of.
No I'm listening, I'm just saying your horribly blinded by your faith that you can't see the way to make things work in the real world . Ya don't want to be a Zealot.
Zaruko-chan wrote:No I'm listening, I'm just saying your horribly blinded by your faith that you can't see the way to make things work in the real world . Ya don't want to be a Zealot.
That was possibly the dumbest, most ignorant thing you have ever said.
Just because something doesn't line up with my beliefs, I can't see how things work. Now you're labeling me with stereotypes. Is that what tyou have your arguments around?
A zealot eh? Then I'm proud to be a zealot for a cause worth defending, Rights for the unborn.
JesusFreak wrote:I disagree.
The constitution says that all people are allowed life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
There is a difference between forcing someone to follow a religion (No, I don't support that. I want Christians to be Christians by choice, not by law.) And Forcing somebody to stop committing acts of murder.
When you come down to it, It seems that your opinion on abortion is influenced by what you think a developing baby in the womb is.
So, she's threatening to spike your PC? THat's the equivalent of what Egypt and Iran would do.
The right to life was intended as meaning the right to a life without tyranny, which ironically banning abortion could be seen as reflecting.
Actually...we are. Always have been. Excluding ourselves from the animal kingdom is never going to work, as we belong to the ape family, and are "homo sapiens" in genus and species.
Incidentally, gorillas are animals, and they have a language, a society, a culture, and opposable thumbs. Wolves have the same (with the exception of opposable thumbs), as do ants and even the lowly cockroach.
...And some beetles are capable of starting fires. ^^;
Question is, do they need it? We have electricity and running water because we've developed it and fooled ourselves into thinking we need commodity's like that to survive (we did just fine for quite a few thousand years without any of that). Now granted, this isn't to say that we should all go back to living like cave people (that would mean no TV and no more CL ;D ), but I hope I'm making a clear point here... ^^;
If it weren't for our weapons and sheer dumb luck/skill, we'd have been toast centuries ago (and not the crispy kind with butter either). So many creatures in this world have far better survival skills then we do, and don't hurt the environment they live in.
Heck, a cockroach could probably survive a nuclear explosion...can we do that? ^^;
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:http://www.nrlc.org/Factsheets/FS14_Reasons.pdf
Instead ofConstant talking without getting anywhere. I'm just gonna post this for now.
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:
The right to life was intended as meaning the right to a life without tyranny, which ironically banning abortion could be seen as reflecting.
Its as much tyranny as banning murder or drug use.
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:
Actually...we are. Always have been. Excluding ourselves from the animal kingdom is never going to work, as we belong to the ape family, and are "homo sapiens" in genus and species.
Incidentally, gorillas are animals, and they have a language, a society, a culture, and opposable thumbs. Wolves have the same (with the exception of opposable thumbs), as do ants and even the lowly cockroach.
...And some beetles are capable of starting fires. ^^;
I'm not saying we are excluded from the animal kingdom, I'm saying we are unique from the rest of the animals in the animal kingdom.
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:THere's a difference between primitive bands of Gorillas eating dead skin off each other and a barber shop. THeres a difference between starting fires and using coal deposits to create steam to power vehicles and saunas (the beetles are still cool. i had no idea about that)
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:
Question is, do they need it? We have electricity and running water because we've developed it and fooled ourselves into thinking we need commodity's like that to survive (we did just fine for quite a few thousand years without any of that). Now granted, this isn't to say that we should all go back to living like cave people (that would mean no TV and no more CL ;D ), but I hope I'm making a clear point here... ^^;
What I was trying to say was that ants couldn't possibly do any of the things we do, such as type on a keyboard and go back and forth about our species in the womb being human.
IMMA FREAKY FO' JESUS wrote:
If it weren't for our weapons and sheer dumb luck/skill, we'd have been toast centuries ago (and not the crispy kind with butter either). So many creatures in this world have far better survival skills then we do, and don't hurt the environment they live in.
Heck, a cockroach could probably survive a nuclear explosion...can we do that? ^^;
Exactly. If we evolved from apes and our survival skills are pathetic, then why are we still around? It takes an awfully large amount of dumb luck/skill. This is one of the biggest gripes I have with evolution, besides bats (seriously. How could a monstrous half shrew-bat thing wiht elongenated fingers survive?).
Okay, That's put up.
Untrue. Drug use actually is legal (otherwise no drugs or medecine could exist). Alcohol and Nicotine are both drugs, and they're completely legal, so why shouldn't abortion be.
And don't even get me started on murder and all its degrees.
At any rate, it is tyranny to forbid a woman to have a procedure that could save her life in a risky pregnancy. That's a death sentence.
Yes, and I was pointing out how we're really not. We just don't understand the intelligence and language and culture of the animals around us.
Honestly, if there's anyone who's the "ignorant beasts" of the planet. It's us, seeing as how most animals seem to be able to understand the signals given off by the other.
Ah, perhaps, but there is also a difference between gorillas who only kill when their young, family and lives are threatened, and humans who just decide one day to shoot somebody for the $10 they may or may not have in their wallets.
There is also a difference between the beaver who cuts down trees only so that he can build a house for his family to live in, and the human woodchopping companies that destroy millions of acres of trees, land, and displace thousands of creatures...simply to put up a mall.
Yes, but we also can't carry things over 10 times our weight/height, as ants can. And who's to say that if an ant were to feel some need to type on a keyboard, that he couldn't do it?
And last I checked, no human could understand the language of ants. So how do we know what they're capable of discussing?
Incidently, ants fight wars, keep slaves, and build elaborate chambers, tunnels, and other architectural sorts of things. Human enough, for you?
And just what is your point about bats? So they're flying mammals that eat fruit and insects. They evolved so that the could fly after the insects they wanted and to reach the fruit high up in the trees. Just look at their tails...it's a spoon for scooping up moths and other bugs out of the air. They've evolved and have become perfectly designed for the tasks they need to perform to survive. If anything, they're brilliant proof as to what evolution can do.
That's the grey area. But it's also a very uncommon case. What's your opinion on non-life-threatening cases?Mewberries151 wrote:At any rate, it is tyranny to forbid a woman to have a procedure that could save her life in a risky pregnancy. That's a death sentence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests